MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2095978179 · doi:10.1109/tpwrs.2005.856992

An Aggregate Weibull Approach for Modeling Short-Term System Generating Capacity

2005· article· en· W2095978179 on OpenAlexaff
C. Lindsay Anderson, Matt Davison

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Systems · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower System Reliability and Maintenance
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpot contractElectricityElectricity marketWeibull distributionElectric power systemDeregulationReliability (semiconductor)EconomicsTerm (time)Reliability engineeringElectricity price forecastingAggregate (composite)Computer scienceEconometricsEngineeringPower (physics)FinanceMacroeconomicsFutures contractElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deregulation of electricity markets is occurring all over the world. This trend introduces new risks and uncertainties into the electricity industry, the most significant being price risk. The spot price of electricity is highly volatile, and the ability to price risk management contracts on this commodity is contingent on a robust and realistic model of the underlying price process. One key driver of electricity spot price is the forced outages of generating plants in the system. The current paper describes a system aggregate model of short-term generating capacity that can be adapted to any generating system of interest. After describing the model, we test it using the IEEE Reliability Test System (RTS).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power SystemsSame topicPower System Reliability and MaintenanceFrench-language works237,207