MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096117816 · doi:10.1109/tdc.2001.971222

230 kV optical voltage transducer using a distributed optical electric field sensor system

2002· article· en· W2096117816 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMagneto-Optical Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransducerVoltageImpulse (physics)High voltageElectrical engineeringPartial dischargeConductorEngineeringElectric fieldMaterials sciencePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Optical technology for use in high-voltage (HV) environments has advanced considerably over the past decade. The design and testing of HV optical voltage transducers (OVTs) that use a series of small optical electric field sensors are described. Three 230 kV OVTs were built and were successfully tested as per IEC (60044-2 and -7), IEEE/ANSI C57.13, and BC Hydro internal specifications at Powertech Labs in Surrey, British Columbia, Canada. The devices met the accuracy requirements of IEC 0.2% class and IEEE 0.3% class and passed lightning impulse tests, chopped impulse tests, partial discharge tests, wet and dry power-frequency withstand tests, and mechanical withstand tests. Further tests showed that the OVTs maintained their calibrations in the presence of "substation-like" changes in local conductor geometry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.919
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it