Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Joint mining of multiple datasets can often discover interesting, novel, and reliable patterns which cannot be obtained solely from any single source. For example, in bioinformatics, jointly mining multiple gene expression datasets obtained by different labs or during various biological processes may overcome the heavy noise in the data. Moreover, by joint mining of gene expression data and protein-protein interaction data, we may discover clusters of genes which show coherent expression patterns and also produce interacting proteins. Such clusters may be potential pathways. In this article, we investigate a novel data mining problem, mining frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques , which is generalized from several interesting applications in bioinformatics, cross-market customer segmentation, social network analysis, and Web mining. In a graph, a set of vertices S is a γ-quasi-clique (0 < γ ≤ 1) if each vertex v in S directly connects to at least γ ⋅ (| S | − 1) other vertices in S . Given a set of graphs G 1 , …, G n and parameter min_sup (0 < min_sup ≤ 1), a set of vertices S is a frequent cross-graph quasi-clique if S is a γ-quasi-clique in at least min_sup ⋅ n graphs, and there does not exist a proper superset of S having the property. We build a general model, show why the complete set of frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques cannot be found by previous data mining methods, and study the complexity of the problem. While the problem is difficult, we develop practical algorithms which exploit several interesting and effective techniques and heuristics to efficaciously mine frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques. A systematic performance study is reported on both synthetic and real data sets. We demonstrate some interesting and meaningful frequent cross-graph quasi-cliques in bioinformatics. The experimental results also show that our algorithms are efficient and scalable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it