MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096343316 · doi:10.1049/ip-cds:20040500

Phase to sinusoid amplitude conversion techniques for direct digital frequency synthesis

2004· article· en· W2096343316 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEE Proceedings - Circuits Devices and Systems · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNumerical Methods and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAmplitudeSineSine waveMathematicsPhase (matter)AlgorithmComputer scienceElectronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)PhysicsOpticsEngineeringElectrical engineeringGeometryArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors present a review of phase to sine amplitude conversion (PSAC) techniques for direct digital frequency synthesis (DDFS). Principles of DDFS are first considered, then approaches for the reduction of system complexity are identified. It is shown that the basic problem for the design of the phase to sine amplitude converter, whether the system has single phase or quadrature outputs, is the reproduction of an approximated sine function for first quadrant angles. The state of the art in PSAC design is then reviewed following a systematic classification of techniques, namely angular decomposition, angular rotation, sine amplitude compression, polynomial approximation, and analogue approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.894
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it