MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096404607 · doi:10.1510/icvts.2005.117465

Complex off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery can be safely taught to cardiothoracic trainees

2006· article· en· W2096404607 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInteractive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineCardiothoracic surgeryInternal thoracic arteryAnginaArteryCanadian Cardiovascular SocietyCardiac surgeryOff-pump coronary artery bypassCoronary artery diseaseEjection fractionBypass graftingSurgeryCoronary artery bypass surgeryCardiologyInternal medicineMyocardial infarctionHeart failure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVES: Off-pump coronary revascularisation is demanding technically as the surgeon is faced with a beating heart and not a bloodless field. The potential clinical advantages of off-pump coronary revascularisation have made this procedure an essential part of a cardiothoracic training program. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of teaching trainees complex off-pump coronary artery surgery (arterial grafting, 'Y' grafts, sequential grafting and minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass) on clinical outcomes. METHODS: All 323 off-pump coronary revascularisation cases performed by one service over a 24-month period were analysed. The 125 (39%) operations performed by two trainees with previous exposure in on-pump surgery were compared with the 198 (61%) performed by an experienced consultant surgeon. Patient and disease characteristics, intra- and post-operative data, morbidity and mortality were analysed using uni- and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The trainees performed 51% of the MIDCABs, 36% of the 'Y' grafts and 27.5% of the sequential grafts. The internal thoracic artery was used in 96% of the cases, radial artery in 49% and bilateral internal thoracic arteries in 11% equally distributed between trainees and consultant. The average number of grafts per case was 3.7 for the consultant and 3.3 for the trainees. Patients operated by the consultants were more likely to have unstable angina (P=0.008), ejection fraction <30% (P=0.01) previous cardiac surgery (P=0.027) and more likely to receive over 4 grafts (P=0.01). Operative mortality was 1.5% for the consultant and 0 for the trainees (P=0.17). Post-operative morbidity, such as re-operation for bleeding (consultant 1% vs. trainee 0.8%), stroke (0.5% vs. 0.8%), haemofiltration (3.5% vs. 0.8%) was similar between the two groups. Hospital stay was also similar. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that trainees under supervision perform complex off-pump coronary artery surgery safely with low rate of mortality and complications. These findings are in agreement with previous literature reports. Trainees should be allowed to operate on sufficient number of patients undergoing off-pump surgery according to their skills and abilities. Patients should be reassured that safety is not compromised by the presence of a trainee as a primary surgeon.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.004
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.256 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it