MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096574248 · doi:10.1109/tit.2003.820019

Context-dependent multilevel pattern matching for lossless image compression

2003· article· en· W2096574248 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Information Theory · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAlgorithms and Data Compression
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRedundancy (engineering)Arithmetic codingLossless compressionData compressionComputer scienceAlgorithmCode (set theory)Systematic codeContext (archaeology)Theoretical computer sciencePrefix codeCoding (social sciences)Constant-weight codePixelUniversal codeContext modelCode rateMathematicsArtificial intelligenceDecoding methodsLinear codeContext-adaptive binary arithmetic codingBlock codeStatisticsProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, the multilevel pattern matching (MPM) code for compression of one-dimensional (1D) sequences is first generalized to compress two-dimensional (2D) images, resulting in a 2D multilevel pattern matching (MPM) code. It is shown that among all images of n pixels, the worst case redundancy of the 2D MPM code against any finite-template-based arithmetic code is O(1//spl radic/logn). This result contrasts unfavorably with the fact that among all 1D sequences of length n, the MPM code has a worst case redundancy of O(1/logn) against any finite-state arithmetic code; this is caused by the so-called 2D boundary effect. To alleviate the 2D boundary effect, we extend the 2D MPM code to the case of context modeling, yielding a context-dependent 2D MPM code. It is shown that among all images of n pixels, the context-dependent 2D MPM code has an O(1/logn) worst case redundancy against any finite-template-based arithmetic code satisfying a mild condition; this redundancy is better than that of the 2D MPM code without context models. Experimental results demonstrate that the context-dependent 2D MPM code significantly outperforms the 2D MPM code without context models for bi-level images. It is also demonstrated that, in terms of compression rates, the context-dependent 2D MPM code performs significantly better than the progressive coding mode of JBIG1 for both textual and bi-level images, and better than or comparably to the sequential coding mode of JBIG1 and JBIG2. In addition to its excellent compression performance, the context-dependent 2D MPM code allows progressive transmission of images.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.659

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.003
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it