MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096600852 · doi:10.13001/1081-3810.1127

Matrix inversion and digraphs: the one factor case

2004· article· en· W2096600852 on OpenAlexafffund
Thomas Britz, D.D. Olesky, P. van den Driessche

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronic Journal of Linear Algebra · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsInvertible matrixDigraphMathematicsInverseCombinatoricsMatrix (chemical analysis)Diagonal matrixInvolutory matrixBlock matrixDiagonalSquare matrixDiagonally dominant matrixPure mathematicsSequence (biology)Simple (philosophy)Inversion (geology)Symmetric matrixEigenvalues and eigenvectorsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The novel concept of a cyclic sequence of a digraph that has precisely one factor is defined, and is used to characterize the entries of the inverse of a matrix with such a digraph. This leads to a characterization of a strongly sign-nonsingular matrix in terms of cyclic sequences. Non-singular nearly reducible matrices are a well-known class of matrices having precisely one nonzero diagonal, and a simple expression for the entries of the inverse of such a matrix in terms of cyclic sequences is derived. A consequence is that a nonsingular nearly reducible matrix is strongly signnonsingular. Several conditions that are equivalent to the inverse of a nonsingular nearly reducible matrix being nearly reducible are obtained.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.025

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronic Journal of Linear AlgebraSame topicMatrix Theory and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207