MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2096791516 · doi:10.1038/nature11632

An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes

2012· article· en· W2096791516 on OpenAlexaff
Gil McVean, Robert E. Handsaker, Mark A. DePristo, Richard Durbin, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Jin Yu, Gábor Marth, Adam Auton

Bibliographic record

VenueNature · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Associations and Epidemiology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcGill UniversityMcGill University and Génome Québec Innovation Centre
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesNational Institute of General Medical SciencesNational Cancer InstituteNational Institute of Mental HealthNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational High-tech Research and Development ProgramWellcome TrustBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research CouncilNational Institute of Environmental Health SciencesGuangdong Province Introduction of Innovative R&D TeamGovernment of Jiangxi ProvinceBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungMax-Planck-GesellschaftSamsungHoward Hughes Medical InstituteNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaDirectorate for Biological SciencesNational Institutes of HealthSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungNational Human Genome Research InstituteNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaU.S. National Library of MedicineBritish Heart FoundationNational Institute on Minority Health and Health DisparitiesDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftNational Center for Advancing Translational SciencesMedical Research CouncilMinistero dello Sviluppo EconomicoNational Science Foundation
KeywordsVariation (astronomy)Human genetic variationHuman genomeGenetic variationGenomeEvolutionary biologyBiologyGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By characterizing the geographic and functional spectrum of human genetic variation, the 1000 Genomes Project aims to build a resource to help to understand the genetic contribution to disease. Here we describe the genomes of 1,092 individuals from 14 populations, constructed using a combination of low-coverage whole-genome and exome sequencing. By developing methods to integrate information across several algorithms and diverse data sources, we provide a validated haplotype map of 38 million single nucleotide polymorphisms, 1.4 million short insertions and deletions, and more than 14,000 larger deletions. We show that individuals from different populations carry different profiles of rare and common variants, and that low-frequency variants show substantial geographic differentiation, which is further increased by the action of purifying selection. We show that evolutionary conservation and coding consequence are key determinants of the strength of purifying selection, that rare-variant load varies substantially across biological pathways, and that each individual contains hundreds of rare non-coding variants at conserved sites, such as motif-disrupting changes in transcription-factor-binding sites. This resource, which captures up to 98% of accessible single nucleotide polymorphisms at a frequency of 1% in related populations, enables analysis of common and low-frequency variants in individuals from diverse, including admixed, populations. This report from the 1000 Genomes Project describes the genomes of 1,092 individuals from 14 human populations, providing a resource for common and low-frequency variant analysis in individuals from diverse populations; hundreds of rare non-coding variants at conserved sites, such as motif-disrupting changes in transcription-factor-binding sites, can be found in each individual. This report by the 1000 Genomes Project describes the genomes of 1,092 individuals from 14 human populations, providing a resource for common and low-frequency variant analysis in individuals from diverse populations. Integrative analyses reveal profiles of rare and common variants in different populations. The frequencies of rare variants vary across biological pathways, and hundreds of rare, non-coding variants at conserved sites — such as changes disrupting transcription-factor motifs — can be established for each individual.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8,218
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNatureSame topicGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyFrench-language works237,207