MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Non-Parametric Bayesian Inference on Bivariate Extremes

2011· article· en· W2096793037 on OpenAlexaff
Simon Guillotte, François Perron, Johan Segers

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFinancial Risk and Volatility Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalUniversity of Prince Edward Island
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMathematicsFrequentist inferenceMarkov chain Monte CarloMeasure (data warehouse)Bayesian probabilityEstimatorExtreme value theoryBayesian inferenceStatisticsApplied mathematicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary The tail of a bivariate distribution function in the domain of attraction of a bivariate extreme value distribution may be approximated by that of its extreme value attractor. The extreme value attractor has margins that belong to a three-parameter family and a dependence structure which is characterized by a probability measure on the unit interval with mean equal to 12, which is called the spectral measure. Inference is done in a Bayesian framework using a censored likelihood approach. A prior distribution is constructed on an infinite dimensional model for this measure, the model being at the same time dense and computationally manageable. A trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is developed and convergence to the posterior distribution is established. In simulations, the Bayes estimator for the spectral measure is shown to compare favourably with frequentist non-parametric estimators. An application to a data set of Danish fire insurance claims is provided.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.011
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0110.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations36
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Statistical Methodology)Same topicFinancial Risk and Volatility ModelingFrench-language works237,207