MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097261252 · doi:10.1109/comst.2004.5342237

Voice over the internet: A tutorial discussing problems and solutions associated with alternative transport

2004· article· en· W2097261252 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice over IPComputer scienceThe InternetService providerTelephonyQuality of serviceInternet service providerService (business)TelecommunicationsNetwork packetComputer networkVoice communicationTelephone networkCircuit switchingPublic switched telephone networkMobile communications over IPWorld Wide WebMobile telephonyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides a tutorial overview of voice over the Internet, examining the effects of moving voice traffic over the packet switched Internet and comparing this with the effects of moving voice over the more traditional circuit-switched telephone system. The emphasis of this document is on areas of concern to a backbone service provider implementing Voice over IP (VoIP). We begin by providing overviews of the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) and VoIP. We then discuss techniques service providers can use to help preserve service quality on their VoIP networks. Next, we briefly discuss Voice over ATM (VoATM) as an alternative to VoIP. Finally, we offer some conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.606

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it