MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097261252 · doi:10.1109/comst.2004.5342237

Voice over the internet: A tutorial discussing problems and solutions associated with alternative transport

2004· article· en· W2097261252 on OpenAlexaff
George Scheets, Marios Parperis, Ritu Singh

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoice over IPComputer scienceThe InternetService providerTelephonyQuality of serviceInternet service providerService (business)TelecommunicationsNetwork packetComputer networkVoice communicationTelephone networkCircuit switchingPublic switched telephone networkMobile communications over IPWorld Wide WebMobile telephonyBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article provides a tutorial overview of voice over the Internet, examining the effects of moving voice traffic over the packet switched Internet and comparing this with the effects of moving voice over the more traditional circuit-switched telephone system. The emphasis of this document is on areas of concern to a backbone service provider implementing Voice over IP (VoIP). We begin by providing overviews of the Plain Old Telephone Service (POTS) and VoIP. We then discuss techniques service providers can use to help preserve service quality on their VoIP networks. Next, we briefly discuss Voice over ATM (VoATM) as an alternative to VoIP. Finally, we offer some conclusions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.042

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.007
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0130.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Communications Surveys & TutorialsSame topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207