Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract This essay won the 2006 Literature Compass Graduate Essay Prize, Shakespeare Section. This article takes as its starting point some of ways in which the events of 9/11 have been integrated into recent critical studies of Shakespeare. These linkages between Shakespeare and 9/11 are a reminder that acts of violence are readily available access points at which to engage with Shakespeare's textual and theatrical manifestations; it is also apparent that broad and contentious issues coalesce around examinations of Shakespeare and violence: authorship, human agency, ideology, the historicizing and politicization of events and texts. With this in mind, it seems a suitable moment for retrospection, to survey prominent voices of the twentieth century in an effort to gain perspective and context for critical interrogations of Shakespeare and violence. This article aims to read critics reading Shakespearean violence in order to identify and examine influential approaches to Shakespeare as well as prominent theoretical modes – Formalism, New Historicism, Cultural Materialism – brought to bear on early modern drama generally.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it