Pulse shapes for ultrawideband communication systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pulse shapes previously proposed for ultrawideband communication systems are studied and compared to determine which provide the best performance. The performance measures considered are the bit error rate in multiple access interference environments and compliance with required spectral emission constraints. The Gaussian monocycles of higher orders and the prolate spheroidal function-based pulses are found to meet the spectral emission masks without frequency shifting. Frequency shifting and bandpass filtering must be used for the modified Hermite polynomial-based pulses to meet the spectral masks. The multiaccess performance average error rates of time-hopping ultrawideband systems using different pulse shapes are examined and compared using a newly published exact performance analysis method. The Gaussian monocycles are shown to achieve performance as good as the prolate spheroidal function-based pulses with the same effective bandwidths in numerical examples. The Gaussian monocycles outperform the modified Hermite polynomial-based pulses for the system models considered. Some tradeoffs of these pulses are also addressed in terms of the complexity of their implementations and the average bit error probabilities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it