MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2097811416 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2008.921114

Discrete-Event Systems Supervisory Control for a Dynamic Flow Controller

2008· article· en· W2097811416 on OpenAlexaff
Ali A. Afzalian, S.A. Nabavi Niaki, Mohammad Reza Iravani, W.M. Wonham

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPetri Nets in System Modeling
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSupervisory controlModular designThyristorController (irrigation)TransformerAutomatonComputer scienceControl systemControl theory (sociology)CapacitorSupervisory control theorySwitched capacitorControl engineeringEngineeringControl (management)Electrical engineeringVoltageProgramming languageTheoretical computer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents supervisory control of a dynamic flow controller (DFC) based on the discrete-event systems (DES) theory. A DFC can be considered as a flexible ac transmission system controller and includes a mechanically-switched phase-shifting transformer, a multimodule thyristor-switched capacitor, a multimodule thyristor-switched reactor, and a mechanically switched capacitor. Owing to the inherent discrete switching nature of a DFC, its components are modeled as finite automata; then, a DES supervisory control is designed to implement the control logic of the DFC system in different modes of operation (i.e., “automatic” and “auto/manual”). It is shown that the specifications are controllable and the synthesized supervisors are nonblocking in both modes and the modular supervisors nonconflict in auto/manual mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPetri Nets in System ModelingFrench-language works237,207