A Noise-Robust FFT-Based Auditory Spectrum With Application in Audio Classification
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we investigate the noise robustness of Wang and Shamma's early auditory (EA) model for the calculation of an auditory spectrum in audio classification applications. First, a stochastic analysis is conducted wherein an approximate expression of the auditory spectrum is derived to justify the noise-suppression property of the EA model. Second, we present an efficient fast Fourier transform (FFT)-based implementation for the calculation of a noise-robust auditory spectrum, which allows flexibility in the extraction of audio features. To evaluate the performance of the proposed FFT-based auditory spectrum, a set of speech/music/noise classification tasks is carried out wherein a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm and a decision tree learning algorithm (C4.5) are used as the classifiers. Features used for classification include conventional Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCCs), MFCC-like features obtained from the original auditory spectrum (i.e., based on the EA model) and the proposed FFT-based auditory spectrum, as well as spectral features (spectral centroid, bandwidth, etc.) computed from the latter. Compared to the conventional MFCC features, both the MFCC-like and spectral features derived from the proposed FFT-based auditory spectrum show more robust performance in noisy test cases. Test results also indicate that, using the new MFCC-like features, the performance of the proposed FFT-based auditory spectrum is slightly better than that of the original auditory spectrum, while its computational complexity is reduced by an order of magnitude.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it