MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098265977 · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmp051

Brain imaging studies of appetite in the context of obesity and the menstrual cycle

2009· review· en· W2098265977 on OpenAlexafffund
Dean A. Van Vugt

Bibliographic record

VenueHuman Reproduction Update · 2009
Typereview
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicRegulation of Appetite and Obesity
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsContext (archaeology)AppetiteMenstrual cycleMedicineObesityEndocrinologyNeuroimagingInternal medicinePhysiologyBiologyHormonePsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND Obesity affects many aspects of health, including reproduction. Despite unrelenting warnings about the health consequences of obesity, its prevalence continues to rise. Beginning with the discovery of leptin in 1994, the endocrinology of energy homeostasis has been significantly advanced. More recently, brain imaging studies have been providing novel insights into homeostatic and hedonic aspects of human ingestive behavior. METHODS A comprehensive MEDLINE search was conducted on the topic of neuroendocrine control of ingestive behavior with an emphasis on functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Additional articles were collected by hand searching the bibliographies of all relevant articles retrieved. RESULTS This review describes recent advances in our understanding of endocrine signals that respond to acute and chronic energy states and regulate ingestive behavior so as to achieve a balance between energy intake and energy expenditure. Recently published brain imaging studies, describing the neural networks that process endocrine signals of energy state and hedonic cues associated with highly palatable foods, are highlighted. Brain responses to food cues are described in the context of appetite changes during the menstrual cycle both in normal physiology and under the conditions anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of obesity belies the plethora of endocrine signals in place to ensure energy homeostasis. However, satiety signals appear to be counteracted by hedonic signals derived from highly palatable foods typical of today's diet. A better understanding of the interaction between homeostatic and hedonic signals is needed to devise effective strategies for dealing with obesity. Menstrual cycle dependent changes in brain responses to food cues may provide insight into the normal physiological control of ingestive behavior as well as dysfunctional regulation associated with disordered eating.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Systematic review · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0050.008
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.065
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSystematic review
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations71
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHuman Reproduction UpdateSame topicRegulation of Appetite and ObesityFrench-language works237,207