MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098314991 · doi:10.1109/robot.1989.100118

Transfer functions for a single flexible link

2003· article· en· W2098314991 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDynamics and Control of Mechanical Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransfer functionFunction (biology)Link (geometry)TorqueComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Deflection (physics)Transfer (computing)AlgorithmApplied mathematicsMathematicsPhysicsArtificial intelligenceEngineeringControl (management)Classical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors examine some issues in the transfer function modeling of a single flexible link. Using the assumed-modes approach, it is possible to find the transfer function between the torque input and the net tip deflection. It is shown that when the number of modes is increased for more accurate modeling, the relative degree of the transfer function becomes ill-defined. This can greatly affect the performance of a controller designed using the model. In addition, any attempt to identify the transfer function is also affected. An alternative approach that uses the rigid body deformations minus the elastic deformations as the output is proposed. This solves the above problems and results in a transfer function with a well-defined relative degree of two. Even if three or four vibration modes are used, the leading coefficient in the numerator is much larger with the proposed new output.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.991
Threshold uncertainty score0.205

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it