MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098380006 · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.04.054

Exploring utilisation of GPU for database applications

2010· article· en· W2098380006 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProcedia Computer Science · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInstitut de Cardiologie de MontréalNvidia
KeywordsComputer scienceAccelerationCentral processing unitCUDAParallel computingBase (topology)General-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsAlgorithmComputational scienceComputer graphics (images)Operating systemGraphics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study is devoted to exploring possible applications of GPU technology for acceleration of the database access. We use the n-gram based approximate text search engine as a test bed for GPU based acceleration algorithms. Two solutions - hybrid CPU/GPU and pure GPU algorithms for query processing are studied and compared with the baseline CPU algorithm as well as with the optimized versions of the CPU algorithm. The hybrid algorithm performs poorly on most queries and only modest acceleration is achievable for long queries with high error level. On the other hand speedups up to 18 times were achieved for pure GPU algorithm. Application of the GPU acceleration for more general data base problems is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.782
Threshold uncertainty score0.392

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.004
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it