MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098506972 · doi:10.1002/xrs.586

Determination of the solid angle of an Si(Li) detector

2002· article· en· W2098506972 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueX-Ray Spectrometry · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicX-ray Spectroscopy and Fluorescence Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCollimatorSolid angleDetectorPosition (finance)OpticsAttenuationCryostatPhysicsRadioactive sourceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Radial and longitudinal scanning of x‐ray detectors with a 55 Fe source is a widely used method for determining their dimensions and position within the cryostat and thence deducing solid angle in an analytical arrangement. The scanning method is refined here to take account of various effects and issues hitherto ignored and therefore reducing its accuracy; these include finite source size, collimator ‘channelling,’ and uncertainty as to the correction for x‐ray attenuation in the intervening air. With proper attention to these effects, it is possible to determine the window–crystal distance to an accuracy of about 0.2 mm; this translates into an accuracy of about 3% for solid angle when the source–detector distance is about 25 mm. However, uncertainty remains in calibrating an analytical system, owing to lack of knowledge of the actual construction of any internal collimator. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it