MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098596704 · doi:10.1109/have.2003.1244724

Assessment of effects of packet loss on speech quality in VoIP

2004· article· en· W2098596704 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Communication Networks Research
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPESQMean opinion scoreVoice over IPPacket lossComputer scienceCodecPSQMSpeech recognitionNetwork packetQuality (philosophy)Quality of serviceVoice activity detectionComputer networkSpeech processingThe InternetSpeech enhancementArtificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the effects of packet loss on speech quality in Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) applications by using ITU-T G.107, the E-model, whose parameters currently only cover limited VoIP scenarios. Several packet loss rates, packet sizes and error concealment techniques for codec G.729 are examined. Mean Opinion Score (MOS) is used as an index for speech quality and is measured by Perceptual Evaluation of Speech Quality (PESQ) algorithm. These effects on speech quality are assessed in the equipment impairment factor domain and then formulated into the E-model. The validation test shows good accuracy of the proposed formula, the prediction errors range between /spl mnplus/0.10 MOS for most cases with an absolute maximum of 0.14 MOS.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score0.240

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.353 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations62
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Communication Networks ResearchFrench-language works237,207