MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098649150 · doi:10.1109/icassp.2003.1200019

Fast convolutive blind speech separation via subband adaptation

2004· article· en· W2098649150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 2003. Proceedings. (ICASSP '03). · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBlind Source Separation Techniques
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlind signal separationComputer scienceReverberationSpeech recognitionFilter bankDistortion (music)Filter (signal processing)Source separationSampling (signal processing)Mixing (physics)ComputationAdaptive filterAlgorithmChannel (broadcasting)AcousticsTelecommunicationsComputer visionBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we consider the problem of blind source separation (BSS) applied to speech signals. Due to reverberation, BSS in the time domain is usually expensive in terms of computations. We propose in this paper a subband BSS system based on the use of adaptive feedback de-mixing networks in an oversampled uniform DFT filter bank structure. We show that the computational cost can be significantly decreased if BSS is carried out in subbands due to the possibility of reducing the sampling rate. Experiments with real speech signals, conducted with two-input two-output BSS systems using oversampled 32-subband and fullband adaptation, indicate that separation quality and distortion are similar for both systems. However, the proposed subband system is more than 10 times computationally faster than the fullband one.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.916
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.263 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it