MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098671909 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564671

The development of a fuzzy neural system for load forecasting

2008· article· en· W2098671909 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Liam Paull, Howard Li, Liuchen Chang

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFuzzy logicNeuro-fuzzyController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemBlock (permutation group theory)Control theory (sociology)Fuzzy electronicsControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)EngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to design an aggregate domestic load control system, a controller requires accurate predictions of load curves to make decisions about which loads should be connected to the grid. This paper presents a 24-hour load forecaster to be used by the controller. The forecaster will employ an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) structure with one input provided by a fuzzy weather controller. The use of fuzzy logic will enhance the performance of the system as well as make it more transparent and adaptable. A unique method is introduced to efficiently incorporate a larger number of inputs into the fuzzy controller without the problem of having an unmanageable rule base. The results show that the fuzzy neural system performs better than the artificial neural network load forecaster with further gains possible by fine-tuning the fuzzy logic block.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.022

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2008
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer EngineeringSame topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207