MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098671909 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2008.4564671

The development of a fuzzy neural system for load forecasting

2008· article· en· W2098671909 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueConference proceedings - Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtificial neural networkComputer scienceFuzzy logicNeuro-fuzzyController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemBlock (permutation group theory)Control theory (sociology)Fuzzy electronicsControl engineeringArtificial intelligenceControl (management)EngineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to design an aggregate domestic load control system, a controller requires accurate predictions of load curves to make decisions about which loads should be connected to the grid. This paper presents a 24-hour load forecaster to be used by the controller. The forecaster will employ an Artificial Neural Network (ANN) structure with one input provided by a fuzzy weather controller. The use of fuzzy logic will enhance the performance of the system as well as make it more transparent and adaptable. A unique method is introduced to efficiently incorporate a larger number of inputs into the fuzzy controller without the problem of having an unmanageable rule base. The results show that the fuzzy neural system performs better than the artificial neural network load forecaster with further gains possible by fine-tuning the fuzzy logic block.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.964

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it