MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Unexpected Ecological Effects of Distributing the Exotic Weevil, <i>Larinus planus</i> (F.), for the Biological Control of Canada Thistle

2002· article· en· W2098901338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConservation Biology · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBiological Control of Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersAnimal and Plant Health Inspection ServiceCooperative State Research, Education, and Extension ServiceNature ConservancyU.S. Department of AgricultureNational Science Foundation
KeywordsThistleWeevilBiological pest controlBiologyCirsium arvenseInvasive speciesBotanyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract: Rhinocyllus conicus , a weevil introduced for biological control of exotic weeds, has had major nontarget ecological effects on native thistles. Some practitioners have argued that this is an isolated case. We report, however, that another Eurasian weevil ( Larinus planus ), currently being distributed in North America for the control of Canada thistle ( Cirsium arvense ), is significantly reducing seed production by a native thistle ( Tracy's thistle, Cirsium undulatum var. tracyi ) in Colorado. In 1999 we discovered L. planus feeding in flower heads of Tracy's thistle near a 1992–1993 biocontrol release site. Of the heads collected, 74% had evidence of L. planus , and these heads produced only 1.1 viable seeds on average, compared with 45.9 in heads without this weevil. In 2000 we investigated whether L. planus feeding persisted on Tracy's thistle and whether this feeding affected seed production significantly. Feeding by L. planus occurred on 80% of the plants and in 76% of all the main heads of Tracy's thistle. Flower heads with L. planus averaged 1.4 viable seeds, compared with 44.5 in uninfested heads. Feeding by L. planus decreased the average number of viable seeds produced per plant by over 51%. In contrast, L. planus had less effect on its targeted exotic host, Canada thistle than it did on Tracy's thistle. The high‐frequency and high‐level feeding of L. planus on the native species, coupled with the lack of evidence of its effectively limiting the seed production or density of Canada thistle suggest that the deliberate distribution of this weevil entails a high risk‐to‐benefit ratio and should be discontinued. Our findings challenge the general assumption that biological control with exotic insects is consistent with conservation goals of weed management in natural areas. Effective, a priori quantitative evaluation of the potential effects on both target and nontarget species and better regulatory oversight are required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.874
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.152 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it