MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2098976017 · doi:10.1177/1077546313508576

Nonlinear stability and bifurcations of an axially moving beam in thermal environment

2014· article· en· W2098976017 on OpenAlexaff
Mergen H. Ghayesh, Marco Amabili

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vibration and Control · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVibration and Dynamic Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonlinear systemGalerkin methodBifurcationAxial symmetryPartial differential equationPhase portraitOrdinary differential equationPhysicsBeam (structure)Mathematical analysisVibrationDiscretizationTransverse planeClassical mechanicsMechanicsDifferential equationMathematicsGeometryOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The thermo-mechanical nonlinear dynamics of an axially moving beam with coupled longitudinal and transverse displacements subjected to a distributed harmonic external force is numerically investigated. This includes a case where the system is tuned to a three-to-one internal resonance between the first two transverse modes and a case where it is not is considered. Two coupled nonlinear partial differential equations for the longitudinal and transverse motions are obtained using Hamilton’s principle and constitutive relations, as well as taking into account the thermal effects. The Galerkin method is then used to discretize these equations into a set of coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations. Two different techniques are employed to solve the resulting equations; the pseudo-arclength continuation method and direct time integration to investigate the periodic vibrations and the global dynamics of the system, respectively. The effect of different parameters on the dynamics of the system is investigated through the frequency-response curves of the system and the bifurcation diagrams of Poincaré maps. Furthermore, time histories, phase-plane portraits, and fast Fourier transforms are presented for a few different system parameter sets. It is illustrated that the system shows a broad variety of rich dynamics, depending on system parameters and the temperature rise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Vibration and ControlSame topicVibration and Dynamic AnalysisFrench-language works237,207