MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099126842 · doi:10.1109/icdm.2001.989592

A simple KNN algorithm for text categorization

2002· article· en· W2099126842 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicText and Document Classification Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceInterpretabilityArtificial intelligenceText categorizationFeature (linguistics)Context (archaeology)VocabularyFeature selectionWord (group theory)CategorizationSimple (philosophy)Class (philosophy)k-nearest neighbors algorithmProcess (computing)Machine learningNatural language processingPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Text categorization (also called text classification) is the process of identifying the class to which a text document belongs. This paper proposes to use a simple non-weighted features KNN algorithm for text categorization. We propose to use a feature selection method that finds the relevant features for the learning task at hand using feature interaction (based on word interdependencies). This will allow us to reduce considerably the number Of selected features from which to learn, making our KNN algorithm applicable in contexts where both the volume of documents and the size of the vocabulary are high, like with the World Wide Web. Therefore, the KNN algorithm that we propose becomes efficient for classifying text documents in that context (in terms of its predictability and interpretability), as is demonstrated. Its simplicity (WRT its implementation and fine-tuning) becomes its main assets for in-the-field applications.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.226

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it