MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099181948 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334886

Electromagnetic transient simulation of large-scale electrical power networks using graphics processing units

2012· article· en· W2099181948 on OpenAlexaff
Jayanta Kumar Debnath, Wai-keung Fung, A.M. Gole, Shaahin Filizadeh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphics processing unitGraphicsCentral processing unitTransient (computer programming)General-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsCUDAParallel processingComputational scienceParallel computingPower (physics)Computer hardwareComputer graphics (images)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation of large scale power systems using graphics processing unit (GPU) based computing is demonstrated. As the size of power system networks increases, the simulation time using conventional central processing units (CPUs) based simulation increases drastically. This paper proposes a hybrid CPU-GPU environment for fast large scale power systems simulation. In this scheme the GPU is mainly deployed to perform the computationally intensive part of the simulation in parallel on its built-in multiple processing cores, and the CPU is assigned for other sequential jobs like flow control of the simulation and storing output data, etc. The GPU-based approach is used to simulate a network with 900 Buses, and it is shown that the CPU-GPU based implementation is 70 times faster than the conventional CPU-based implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207