MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099181948 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2012.6334886

Electromagnetic transient simulation of large-scale electrical power networks using graphics processing units

2012· article· en· W2099181948 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReal-time simulation and control systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceGraphics processing unitGraphicsCentral processing unitTransient (computer programming)General-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsCUDAParallel processingComputational scienceParallel computingPower (physics)Computer hardwareComputer graphics (images)Operating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper electromagnetic transient (EMT) simulation of large scale power systems using graphics processing unit (GPU) based computing is demonstrated. As the size of power system networks increases, the simulation time using conventional central processing units (CPUs) based simulation increases drastically. This paper proposes a hybrid CPU-GPU environment for fast large scale power systems simulation. In this scheme the GPU is mainly deployed to perform the computationally intensive part of the simulation in parallel on its built-in multiple processing cores, and the CPU is assigned for other sequential jobs like flow control of the simulation and storing output data, etc. The GPU-based approach is used to simulate a network with 900 Buses, and it is shown that the CPU-GPU based implementation is 70 times faster than the conventional CPU-based implementations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.481
Threshold uncertainty score0.532

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicReal-time simulation and control systemsFrench-language works237,207