Design, simulation and manufacturing of a Tracked Surveillance unmanned ground vehicle
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes design, Simulation and manufacturing procedures of HIRAD - a teleoperated Tracked Surveillance UGV for military, Rescue and other civilian missions in various hazardous environments. A Double Stabilizer Flipper mechanism mounted on front pulleys enables the Robot to have good performance in travelling over uneven terrains and climbing stairs. Using this Stabilizer flipper mechanism reduces energy consumption while climbing the stairs or crossing over obstacles. The locomotion system mechanical design is also described in detail. The CAD geometry 3D-model has been produced by CATIA software. To analyze the system mobility, a virtual model was developed with ADAMS Software. This simulation included different mobility maneuvers such as stair climbing, gap crossing and travelling over steep slopes. The simulations enabled us to define motor torque requirements. We performed many experiments with manufactured prototype under various terrain conditions Such as stair climbing, gap crossing and slope elevation. In experiments, HIRAD shows good overcoming ability for the tested terrain conditions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it