Developing Reflective Writers in Primary Schools: Findings from partnership research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite some reservations over the efficacy of practitioner research, there have been positive moves to engage teachers, as classroom researchers, in partnership with Institutes of Higher Education. In England the Teacher Training Agency (1996) has provided bursaries for teachers to undertake small-scale research and the Department for Education and Skills (2000/1) has encouraged the development of school-based inquiry through the Best Practice Scholarship scheme. This article describes work undertaken as part of a university-funded school partnership programme initiated to encourage collaborative research between teachers and tutors. In the Teaching Reading and Writing Links project (TRAWL)14 teachers, working as research partners in seven primary schools, explored ways of developing children as reflective writers. Some findings are illustrated and the impact of the partnership on pupils and teachers is examined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it