Using Antenna Array in Multipath Environment for Wireless Sensor Positioning
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The rapid growth in demand for location based service has encouraged research into the performance improvement for wireless sensor positioning systems. Most of proposed localization techniques for wireless sensor networks rely on multilateration or cooperative localization. In this paper, we propose a novel approach in the context of multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) communication technique to determine the position of sensor nodes. MIMO communication systems use antenna array in both source and receive nodes to exploit the spatial properties of the multipath channel, thereby offering more information for sensor positioning. Based on estimated multipath signal parameters such as angle-of-arrival, angle-of-departure and delay-of-arrival through adaptive array signal processing techniques, the proposed approach try to minimize the errors occurring from the estimation of multipath signal parameters and gives an optimal estimation of the position of the neighbor sensor node by simultaneously resolving a set of nonlinear location equations. Computer simulations show that the position of sensor node can be determined using only one other sensor node. The mean-square errors are measured and compared with the Cramer-Rao Lower Bound to demonstrate the performance of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it