MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099689402 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2008.5151995

Investigation of autonomous docking strategies for robotic operation on intervention panels

2008· article· en· W2099689402 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Particle filterComputer scienceRangingArtificial intelligenceSonarComputer visionDocking (animal)SimulationFilter (signal processing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a localization strategy for an AUV which autonomously docks on intervention panels. A brief review of past research and working solutions of docking motivates the proposed choice of the strategy. It combines a ranging sonar localization technique featuring a modified particle filter at large distance and a visual model-based pose estimation using on-board camera at close distance to the docking panel. The particle filter solution is enhanced for effective exploration of the vehicle states without increasing the computational demand. It operates in an environment with a known map and has a real-time performance. The pose recognition algorithm derives from POSIT and is optimized for robustness. The visual docking utilizes a set of point-light markers which guarantees good accuracy at a large range of angles. Mentioned strategies are proven in a number of simulations as well as practical tests.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.623
Threshold uncertainty score0.311

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207