Thresholding neural network for adaptive noise reduction
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the paper, a type of thresholding neural network (TNN) is developed for adaptive noise reduction. New types of soft and hard thresholding functions are created to serve as the activation function of the TNN. Unlike the standard thresholding functions, the new thresholding functions are infinitely differentiable. By using the new thresholding functions, some gradient-based learning algorithms become possible or more effective. The optimal solution of the TNN in a mean square error (MSE) sense is discussed. It is proved that there is at most one optimal solution for the soft-thresholding TNN. General optimal performances of both soft and hard thresholding TNNs are analyzed and compared to the linear noise reduction method. Gradient-based adaptive learning algorithms are presented to seek the optimal solution for noise reduction. The algorithms include supervised and unsupervised batch learning as well as supervised and unsupervised stochastic learning. It is indicated that the TNN with the stochastic learning algorithms can be used as a novel nonlinear adaptive filter. It is proved that the stochastic learning algorithm is convergent in certain statistical sense in ideal conditions. Numerical results show that the TNN is very effective in finding the optimal solutions of thresholding methods in an MSE sense and usually outperforms other noise reduction methods. Especially, it is shown that the TNN-based nonlinear adaptive filtering outperforms the conventional linear adaptive filtering in both optimal solution and learning performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it