MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2099820850 · doi:10.1142/s0129055x00000563

CORRUGATED SURFACES AND A.C. SPECTRUM

2000· review· en· W2099820850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReviews in Mathematical Physics · 2000
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicSpectral Theory in Mathematical Physics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbsolute continuitySpectrum (functional analysis)MathematicsLaplace operatorCombinatoricsSpace (punctuation)Boundary (topology)Function (biology)Random variableScatteringMathematical physicsWave functionMathematical analysisPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study spectral and scattering properties of the discrete Laplacian H on the half-space [Formula: see text] with boundary condition ψ(n, -1) = V (n) ψ (n, 0). We consider cases where V is a deterministic function and a random process on Z d . Let H 0 be the Dirichlet Laplacian on [Formula: see text]. We show that the wave operators Ω ± (H, H 0 ) exist for all V, and in particular, that σ (H 0 )⊂ σ ac (H). We study when and where the wave operators are complete and the spectrum of H is purely absolutely continuous, and prove some optimal results. In particular, if V is a random process on a probability space (Ω, ℱ, P), such that the random variables V (n) are independent and have densities, we show that the spectrum of H on σ (H 0 ) is purely absolutely continuous P-a.s. If in addition lim |V(n)| = ∞ P-a.s., we show that the wave operators Ω ± (H, H 0 ) are complete on σ (H 0 ) P-a.s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.434
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0090.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.150
GPT teacher head0.409
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it