MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100004783 · doi:10.1017/s0959270913000178

Molecular phylogeny of the South American sheldgeese with implications for conservation of Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and continental populations of the Ruddy-headed Goose<i>Chloephaga rubidiceps</i>and Upland Goose<i>C. picta</i>

2013· article· en· W2100004783 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Mariana Bulgarella, Cecilia Kopuchian, Adrián S. Di Giacomo, Ricardo Matus, Olivia Blank, Robert E. Wilson, Kevin G. McCracken

Bibliographic record

VenueBird Conservation International · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic diversity and population structure
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y TécnicasInternational Development Research CentreNational Science Foundation
KeywordsPopulationEcologyBiologyGeographyEndangered speciesZoologyHabitatDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Sheldgeese of the genusChloephagaare waterfowl (Anatidae) endemic to mainland South America and the Falkland Islands (Malvinas). Continental populations of three speciesC. picta,C. poliocephala, andC. rubidicepsbreed in Patagonia and Tierra del Fuego and migrate northwards to winter in central Argentina and Chile. These continental populations have declined by > 50% in the past 30 years due to direct hunting to control crop damage and by the introduction of the grey foxDusicyon griseusto their breeding grounds in Tierra del Fuego. The continental population ofC. rubidicepsis critically endangered, estimated to be < 1,000 individuals. While no historic population size estimates exist forC. rubidicepsin its wintering grounds, the breeding population in Tierra del Fuego was estimated to number several thousand individuals in the 1950s. In contrast, theC. rubidicepspopulation in the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) is non-migratory and stable with > 42,000 individuals, as is the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) population ofC. picta leucopterawith > 138,000 individuals. Here we use sequence data from the mitochondrial DNA control region to quantify genetic divergence between insular and continental populations of these two species of sheldgeese.Chloephaga rubidicepsandC. pictashowed significant intraspecific differentiation of 1.0% and 0.6%, respectively. In both cases, mainland and insular populations were reciprocally monophyletic and did not share mtDNA haplotypes. These results suggest that the insular and continental populations ofC. rubidicepsandC. pictaare genetically distinct and that female-mediated gene flow is restricted. We recommend a reevaluation of the threat category status of the continentalC. rubidicepspopulation, under IUCN guidelines. It is necessary to implement urgent actions for the conservation of this critically endangered population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBird Conservation InternationalSame topicGenetic diversity and population structureFrench-language works237,207