High-Dimensional Similarity Searches Using A Metric Pseudo-Grid
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the proposal of numerous tree-based access structures for high dimensional similarity searches, techniques based on a sequential scan have been shown to be simple yet quite efficient alternatives. Given that random accesses to disk are expensive, a linear scan of the (smaller) pre-processed dataset is often much more efficient than even a relatively small number of random disk accesses yielded by tree-based indices. In this paper we present a technique which uses a pseudo-partition of a general metric space analog to the VA-file’s partition of the vector space. The rationale is to use a number of pivot objects in the metric space, each one determining a number of hyper-rings in this space. The intersection of those rings, determine pseudo-cells analog to the VA-file cells in the vector space. In order to speedup query processing the data set is clustered (using any applicable clustering technique). Clusters not intersecting cells intersected by the query region cannot contribute to the answer set. Thus, only a few clusters are searched using an I/O efficient linear scan of the cluster’s data. The proposed technique, which we call the M-GRID, is, by construction, applicable to both general metric spaces and to traditional vector spaces as long as a metric distance function is used. The M-GRID is robust to several parameters and experiments with synthetic and real data sets show that it is able to perform nearest neighbor queries up to 10 times faster than the VA-File.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it