MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100256715 · doi:10.1109/nnsp.1994.366042

Acoustic echo cancellation for hands-free telephony using neural networks

2002· article· en· W2100256715 on OpenAlexafffund
A.N. Birkett, Rafik Goubran

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaInstituto de Telecomunicações
KeywordsLoudspeakerEcho (communications protocol)Sigmoid functionTelephonyComputer scienceTransfer functionArtificial neural networkClipping (morphology)Speech recognitionSIGNAL (programming language)Piecewise linear functionActivation functionAcousticsFunction (biology)Artificial intelligenceTelecommunicationsEngineeringMathematicsPhysicsElectrical engineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of the limitations of linear adaptive echo cancellers in hands-free environments is their inability to effectively cancel nonlinearities which are generated mainly in the loudspeaker during large signal peaks. The soft-clipping effect encountered when large signals are applied to the loudspeaker is modelled in a neural network using a piecewise linear/sigmoid activation function. A three-layer fully adaptive feedforward network is used to model the room/speakerphone transfer function using the special activation function. This network structure improves the ERLE performance by 10 dB at low to medium loudspeaker volumes compared to a NLMS echo canceller.>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207