MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2100297189 · doi:10.1002/geot.201000053

Role of brittle fracture on swelling behaviour of weak rock tunnels: hypothesis and qualitative evidence /

2010· article· en· W2100297189 on OpenAlexaff
Walter Steiner, Peter K. Kaiser, Georg Spaun

Bibliographic record

VenueGeomechanics and Tunnelling · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRock Mechanics and Modeling
Canadian institutionsCentre for Excellence in Mining Innovation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnhydriteSwellingBrittlenessBrittle fractureGeotechnical engineeringOverburden pressureGeologyGypsumMaterials scienceComposite materialFracture (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Underground construction in rock prone to swelling behaviour may result in long‐term problems, especially in the invert, if the structure cannot resist swelling pressures. Swelling phenomena are not only a consequence of ground conditions but are strongly influenced by excavation and construction procedures. Evidence of brittle failure observed in the field will be presented and analyzed to prove that brittle failure is the trigger effect of swelling phenomena in shale and clay‐anhydrite rocks. Brittle fractures have also been observed in laboratory swelling tests. Brittle failure can create cracks that form pathways for water, leading to changes in the stress‐state, and as a consequence trigger swelling phenomena. In clay‐anhydrite rock, the swelling pressure is caused by the crystallization pressure of gypsum. The excavation and construction procedures used for the tunnel are a decisive factor for controlling swelling behaviour. Quellvorgänge in Tongesteinen und Ton‐Anhydritgesteinen führen oft zu langfristigen Problemen in Untertagebauten, insbesondere wenn der Ausbauwiderstand der Tragkonstruktion langfristig zu gering ist. Die Quellvorgänge, die besonders im Sohlbereich auftreten, sind nicht bloß eine Folge der Gesteinseigenschaften, sondern werden auch von den gewählten Bauvorgängen und der Tragkonstruktion beeinflusst. Sprödbruchvorgänge wurden in vielen Untertagbauten in Felsgesteinen mit geringer Festigkeit beobachtet. Deren Ursachen werden mit numerischen Modellen analysiert. Sprödbrüche wurden aber auch in Laborquellversuchen in Ton‐Anhydritgesteinen, wo sich Gips bildete, beobachtet. Die unterschiedlichen Beobachtungen werden in einen gemeinsamen Rahmen zusammengefügt. Sprödbrüche führen zur Bildung von Rissen und damit von Wasserwegen. Weiter ergeben sich wesentlichen Änderungen des Spannungszustands um die unterirdische Öffnung, und als Folge dieser Vorgänge werden Quellerscheinungen ausgelöst. In Ton‐Anhydritgesteinen wird der höhere Quelldruck durch den Kristallisationsdruck von Gips verursacht. Der gewählte Bauvorgang muss Sprödbruchvorgänge möglichst vermeiden und ist ein wesentlicher Faktor des aufzunehmenden Quelldrucks und der Quellerscheinungen.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeomechanics and TunnellingSame topicRock Mechanics and ModelingFrench-language works237,207