Reconstruction of Piecewise Chaotic Dynamic Using a Genetic Algorithm Multiple Model Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Reconstruction of chaotic dynamics from its time-series measurement is an important problem for many engineering applications. In this paper, we propose using a novel multiple model (MM) predictor based on a genetic algorithm (GA) to reconstruct piecewise chaotic dynamics. The motivation relies on the observation that conventional single model is usually unable to reconstruct the piecewise dynamics properly because a piecewise map is nonsmooth. In our approach, multiple radial basis function (RBF) neural predictors are used to model the piecewise dynamic in different partition intervals. Switching between different intervals could be estimated by a nonlinear gate model. In particular, a GA is employed here to train the MM and to obtain the optimal RBF parameters. Compared to conventional chaos dynamic reconstruction techniques, the proposed GA-MM method is shown to greatly improve the reconstruction performance for piecewise chaotic dynamics. The superiority is further verified by applying the GA-MM method to model the real-life radar sea-clutter signal obtained from Nova Scotia (NS), Canada, and to predict the electric power pool price time series from Alberta (AB), Canada. Both kinds of real data show that the GA-MM is effective in building a dynamical model. The proposed GA-MM method is also applied to the channel equalization problem of chaos communication systems. Based on the minimum nonlinear prediction error equalization method, it is shown that the GA-MM method has a satisfactory equalization performance even under strong channel effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it