MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101028480 · doi:10.1109/wirles.2005.1549468

Cluster-based Replication for Large-scale Mobile Ad-hoc Networks

2005· article· en· W2101028480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceReplication (statistics)Mobile ad hoc networkWireless ad hoc networkCluster (spacecraft)Vehicular ad hoc networkScale (ratio)Computer networkDistributed computingWirelessGeographyTelecommunicationsMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Replication provides a feasible solution for improving data accessibility in highly dynamic and fault prone mobile ad-hoc environments. Efficient replica management, however, remains a challenging problem due to the inherent unreliable and unstable nature of mobile ad-hoc networks. This paper proposes a novel optimistic replication scheme, for achieving efficient consistency maintenance in large-scale ad-hoc mobile networks. Distributed hash table replication (DHTR) organizes all mobile nodes into non-overlapping clusters and builds a two-level distributed replica information directory on cluster heads to facilitate the propagation of query and update messages. DHTR also employs distributed hash table techniques to speed up the directory lookup process. Simulation results demonstrate that DHTR improves the performance with respect to update propagation in comparison with the ROAM replication system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.907
Threshold uncertainty score0.298

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations39
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207