Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Static timing analysis (STA) techniques allow a designer to check the timing of a circuit at different process corners, which typically include corner values of the supply voltages as well. Traditionally, however, this analysis only considers cases where the supplies are either all low or all high. As will be demonstrated, this may not yield the true maximum delay of a circuit because it neglects the possible mismatch between the supplies of successive gates on a path. A new methodology for timing analysis is proposed, where, in a first step, the critical paths of a circuit are identified under an assumption that all the supply nodes are independent of one another, thus allowing for mismatch between the supplies. Then, given these critical paths, the authors incorporate into the analysis the relationships between the supply node voltages by considering the power grid that they are tied to, and refine the worst case time delay values on a per-critical-path basis. This refinement is posed as a sequence of optimization problems where the operation of the circuit is abstracted in terms of current constraints. The authors present their technique and report on the implementation results using benchmark circuits tied to a number of test-case power grids
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it