MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101152940 · doi:10.1177/1094428106286984

Programs for Problems Created by Continuous Variable Distributions in Moderated Multiple Regression

2006· article· en· W2101152940 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueOrganizational Research Methods · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Statistical Methods and Models
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNormalityMultivariate statisticsEconometricsStatisticsComputer scienceField (mathematics)Regression analysisTrustworthinessVariance (accounting)Data setMultivariate analysis of varianceVariable (mathematics)PsychologyMathematicsSocial psychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is difficult to detect interactions between continuous variables in field research using moderated multiple regression (MMR). One reason is that multivariate normality, which occurs in field research but not experimental research, suppresses the residual variance of interaction terms. SPSS, SAS, and Matlab programs that expose the extent of this problem for any given data set are provided. Ironically, when significant interactions are found in field research using MMR, this is because the assumption of multivariate normality has been violated, thus rendering the significance tests potentially invalid. The programs presented in this article compute more trustworthy significance levels via data randomization.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMetaresearch
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.115
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.548
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it