MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

MEASURING AND MANAGING THE LEARNING REQUIREMENTS OF ROUTE REOPTIMIZATION ON DELIVERY VEHICLE DRIVERS

2002· article· en· W2101182156 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Business Logistics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicVehicle Routing Optimization Methods
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)Computer scienceTraverseKey (lock)Vehicle routing problemRisk analysis (engineering)Fleet managementRouting (electronic design automation)Operations managementTransport engineeringBusinessOperations researchComputer securityEngineeringTelecommunicationsEconomicsComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Outbound logistical systems that are designed with the flexibility to perform daily reoptimization of delivery routes are often touted as the systems of choice in dealing with randomly fluctuating (stochastic) customer demands. However, a potential drawback with such systems is that the day‐to‐day changes in the delivery routes force each driver to traverse routes that extend beyond the region required if customer demands remained stable. That is, the efficient completion of deliveries under route reoptimization imposes an additional requirement on drivers to learn these routes. Quantification and analysis of this additional learning requirement, along with some of the associated human resource management implications, comprise the paper's primary focus. A key contribution of the research is that the analysis accounts for the cost‐effectiveness of a vehicle routing tactic that might be used to reduce the learning burden.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.868
Threshold uncertainty score0.339

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.246
Teacher spread0.172 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it