MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101645028 · doi:10.1109/tip.2008.922410

New Classes of Radiometric and Combined Radiometric-Geometric Invariant Descriptors

2008· article· en· W2101645028 on OpenAlexaff
Samy Metari, F. Deschênes

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Image Processing · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransformation geometryInvariant (physics)Artificial intelligenceMathematicsGeometric transformationComputer visionPattern recognition (psychology)Computer scienceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Real images can contain geometric distortions as well as photometric degradations. Analysis and characterization of those images without recourse to either restoration or geometric standardization is of great importance for the computer vision community as those two processes are often ill-posed problems. To this end, it is necessary to implement image descriptors that make it possible to identify the original image in a simple way independently of the imaging system and imaging conditions. Ideally, descriptors that capture image characteristics must be invariant to the whole range of geometric distortions and photometric degradations, such as blur, that may affect the image. In this paper, we introduce two new classes of radiometric and/or geometric invariant descriptors. The first class contains two types of radiometric invariant descriptors. The first of these type is based on the Mellin transform and the second one is based on central moments. Both descriptors are invariant to contrast changes and to convolution with any kernel having a symmetric form with respect to the diagonals. The second class contains two subclasses of combined invariant descriptors. The first subclass includes central-moment-based descriptors invariant simultaneously to horizontal and vertical translations, to uniform and anisotropic scaling, to stretching, to convolution, and to contrast changes. The second subclass contains central-complex-moment-based descriptors that are simultaneously invariant to similarity transformation and to contrast changes. We apply these invariant descriptors to the matching of geometric transformed and/or blurred images. Experimental results confirm both the robustness and the effectiveness of the proposed invariants.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0040.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Image ProcessingSame topicAdvanced Image and Video Retrieval TechniquesFrench-language works237,207