MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2101701661 · doi:10.5194/bg-5-1259-2008

The impact of lateral carbon fluxes on the European carbon balance

2006· article· en· W2101701661 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBiogeosciences · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAtmospheric and Environmental Gas Dynamics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarbon sinkEnvironmental scienceCarbon fibersSink (geography)Carbon cycleEcosystemTotal organic carbonEstuaryOceanographyCarbon fluxAtmospheric sciencesClimate changeGeologyEcologyGeographyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. To date, little has been written about the important role played by processes transporting carbon laterally over continents, and from continents to oceans. These processes have an impact on the CO2 budgets and on the carbon budgets at local, regional and continental scales. We estimated the impact on the European carbon balance of the transport of carbon by the trade of wood and food products, by the emission and oxidation of reactive reduced carbon species, and by rivers and freshwater systems up to estuaries. The analysis is completed by new estimates of the carbon fluxes of coastal seas. The magnitude of the CO2 and carbon fluxes caused by lateral transport over Europe is comparable to current estimates of carbon gain by European ecosystems. At the continental level, we estimate a CO2 sink over Europe of 140 TgC yr−1 and a carbon sink of 50 TgC yr−1 being caused by lateral transport processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.063
Threshold uncertainty score0.987

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it