Speech enhancement employing Laplacian-Gaussian mixture
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new, efficient speech enhancement algorithm (SEA) is developed in this paper. In this low-complexity SEA, a noisy speech signal is first decorrelated and then the clean speech components are estimated from the decorrelated noisy speech samples. The distributions of clean speech and noise signals are assumed to be Laplacian and Gaussian, respectively. The clean speech components are estimated either by maximum likelihood (ML) or minimum-mean-square-error (MMSE) estimators. These estimators require some statistical parameters derived from speech and noise. These parameters are adaptively extracted by the ML approach during the active speech or silence intervals, respectively. In addition, a voice activity detector (VAD) that uses the same statistical model is employed to detect whether the speech is active or not. The simulation results show that our SEA approach performs as well as a recent high efficiency SEA that employs the Wiener filter. The computational complexity of this algorithm is very low compared with existing SEAs with low computational complexity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it