MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102222662 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2004.824428

Online Tracking of Voltage Flicker Utilizing Energy Operator and Hilbert Transform

2004· article· en· W2102222662 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlickerTracking (education)Electronic engineeringControl theory (sociology)VoltageHilbert transformComputer scienceEnergy (signal processing)Tracking errorEngineeringArtificial intelligenceElectrical engineeringMathematicsTelecommunicationsControl (management)Spectral density

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Teager energy operator (TEO) and the Hilbert transform (HT) are introduced in this paper as effective approaches for tracking the voltage flicker levels in distribution systems. The mathematical simplicity of the proposed techniques, compared with the commonly used algorithms in the literature, renders them competitive candidates for the online tracking of voltage flicker levels. Moreover, the TEO and the HT are capable of tracking the amplitude variations of the voltage flicker and supply frequency in industrial systems with only a 3% margin of error. Such accurate tracking facilitates the implementation of the control of flicker mitigation devices. A detailed comparison of the two proposed approaches that profile the different factors affecting tracking accuracy is presented. The results are provided to verify the tracking capabilities of both HT and TEO and to indicate the superior performance of the TEO and the HT in tracking voltage flicker.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.683
Threshold uncertainty score0.945

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it