MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102273020 · doi:10.1109/tpwrd.2004.834891

Modeling and Protection of a Three-Phase Power Transformer Using Wavelet Packet Transform

2005· article· en· W2102273020 on OpenAlexaff
S. A. Saleh, M.A. Rahman

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Power Delivery · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWavelet packet decompositionInrush currentWavelet transformWaveletDiscrete wavelet transformSecond-generation wavelet transformStationary wavelet transformTransformerElectronic engineeringAlgorithmComputer scienceEngineeringElectrical engineeringArtificial intelligenceVoltage

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper introduces a novel algorithm for differential protection of three-phase power transformers that is based on the wavelet packet transform. The wavelet packet transform is employed to extract certain features of the differential current to distinguish between the magnetizing inrush and different internal fault currents. The selection of the optimal wavelet analysis that includes selecting both the optimal mother wavelet and the optimal number of levels of resolution is carried out using the minimum description length (MDL) data criteria. The proposed algorithm is tested off-line using data collected from a prototype laboratory three-phase power transformer. The test results show reduced computational burden, high speed and high accuracy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations168
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Power DeliverySame topicPower Systems Fault DetectionFrench-language works237,207