MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102494399 · doi:10.1109/taes.2013.6621845

Multiple Model Multi-Bernoulli Filters for Manoeuvering Targets

2013· article· en· W2102494399 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRecursion (computer science)AlgorithmComputer scienceFilter (signal processing)Cardinality (data modeling)Mathematical optimizationParticle filterGaussianNonlinear systemProbability density functionGaussian processMonte Carlo methodMathematicsData miningStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cardinality balanced multitarget multi-Bernoulli (CBMeMBer) filter is a recursive, multitarget tracking mechanism based on the random finite set (RFS) theory using the finite set statistics (FISST) framework. It provides an estimate of the number of targets in a given scenario space, along with the most likely locations of those targets. It also provides this estimate without the expensive operation of multidimensional assignment between measurements and target estimates. Unlike other RFS methods, the CBMeMBer filter outputs an estimate of the actual multitarget probability density function. Current implementations include a nonlinear sequential Monte Carlo (SMC) approximation, as well as an analytical Gaussian mixture (GM) solution. A new MeMBer recursion for tracking multiple targets traveling under multiple motion models is introduced. The multiple model CBMeMBer (MM-CBMeMBer) filter presented here uses jump Markov models (JMM) to extend the standard CBMeMBer recursion to allow for multiple target motion models. This extension is implemented using both the SMC- and GM-based CBMeMBer approximations. The recursive prediction and update equations are presented for both implementations. Each multiple model implementation is validated against its respective standard CBMeMBer implementation, as well as against each other. This validation is done using a simulated scenario containing multiple manoeuvering targets. A variety of metrics, including estimate accuracy, model detection capability, and algorithm computational efficiency are used for performance evaluation. The new method is shown to improve results in several metrics with only a minor increase in computational complexity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.967
Threshold uncertainty score0.953

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it