MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102518521 · doi:10.1109/temc.2009.2023364

Estimation of Antenna Effect on Ultra-Wideband Pulse Shape in Transmission and Reception

2009· article· en· W2102518521 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPulsed Power Technology Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHorn antennaAcousticsPulse (music)Directional antennaAntenna (radio)Ultra-widebandWidebandOpticsPhysicsElectronic engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsSlot antenna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents an analysis of the antenna effect on ultra-wideband (UWB) pulse shape in transmission and reception. This analysis consists of a derivation of the impulse response for frequently used UWB antennas like the ridged horn, transverse electromagnetic horn, and bicone in the transmitting and receiving modes. An analytical/semianalytical expression for the received pulse has been derived. Frequency-limited gain of the transmitting and receiving antennas has been accounted for in the estimation of the received pulse. To demonstrate the antenna effect on a UWB pulse, various antenna combinations have been considered to transmit and receive different Gaussian pulses. A combination of transmitting and receiving antennas has been proposed for faithful reception of the transmitted pulse. This paper also studies the pulse shape and amplitude due to oblique incidence of the pulse on a receiving antenna. Measurements have been presented to support the proposed analysis, and they show good agreement with the estimated received pulses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.477
Threshold uncertainty score0.879

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it