MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2102842504 · doi:10.1109/lsp.2004.827917

Exact Fractional-Order Differentiators for Polynomial Signals

2004· article· en· W2102842504 on OpenAlexaff
S. Samadi, M. Omair Ahmad, M.N.S. Swamy

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Signal Processing Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Control Systems Design
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDifferentiatorMathematicsFractional calculusPolynomialInteger (computer science)Applied mathematicsImpulse responseImpulse (physics)Mathematical analysisComputer scienceBandwidth (computing)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A discrete-time fractional-order differentiator is modeled as a finite-impulse response (FIR) system. The system yields fractional-order derivatives of Riemann-Liouville type for a uniformly sampled polynomial signal. The computation of the output signal is based on the additive combination of the weighted outputs of N cascaded first-order digital differentiators. For differentiators of fractional order with a terminal value equal to zero, the weights are time-varying. The weights are obtained in a closed form involving the Stirling numbers of the first kind. The system tends to a time-invariant integer-order differentiator when the order of the derivative tends to an integer value. It yields exact fractional- or integer-order derivatives of a sampled polynomial signal of a certain order.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Signal Processing LettersSame topicAdvanced Control Systems DesignFrench-language works237,207