MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2103060283 · doi:10.1109/arith.2013.24

The Floating-Point Unit of the Jaguar x86 Core

2013· article· en· W2103060283 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Rupley, James King, Eric Quinnell, F. Galloway, K. Patton, P.-M. Seidel, Jean-Louis Dinh, Hai Bui, Achintya K. Bhowmik

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicParallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
Canadian institutionsAdvanced Micro Devices (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceFloating pointx86Parallel computingFloating-point unitArithmetic logic unitInteger (computer science)OperandCoprocessorComputer hardwareOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The AMD Jaguar x86 core uses a fully-synthesized, 128-bit native floating-point unit (FPU) built as a co-processor model. The Jaguar FPU supports several x86 ISA extensions, including x87, MMX, SSE1 through SSE4.2, AES, CLMUL, AVX, and F16C instruction sets. The front end of the unit decodes two complex operations per cycle and uses a dedicated renamer (RN), free list (FL), and retire queue (RQ) for in-order dispatch and retire. The FPU issues to the execution units with a dedicated out-of-order, dual-issue scheduler. Execution units source operands from a synthesized physical register file (PRF) and bypass network. The back end of the unit has two execution pipes: the first pipe contains a vector integer ALU, a vector integer MUL unit, and a floating-point adder (FPA), the second pipe contains a vector integer ALU, a store-convert unit, and a floating-point iterative multiplier (FPM). The implementation of the unit focused on low-power design and on vectorized single-precision (SP) performance optimizations. The verification of the unit required complex pseudo-random and formal verification techniques. The Jaguar FPU is built in a 28nm CMOS process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.059

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.011

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesFrench-language works237,207