Numerical upscaling of electrical conductivity: A problem specific approach to generate coarse-scale models
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work we propose a new approach for the upscaling problem of electrical conductivity in the context of electromagnetic methods. We pose the upscaling problem as a parameter estimation problem, which allow us to develop a goaloriented, quantitative framework that combines widely used simulation tools such as Mimetic Finite Volume, inversion and optimization techniques. We thus create a flexible methodology that allows the users to estimate, in an affordable manner, coarse-scale conductivity models that approximate, in some sense, the fine-scale ones. Our framework is based on the observation that for any conductivity model a number of different criteria can be considered for the homogenization problem. In particular, different physical fields and fluxes can be considered. Our framework allows the choice of the criteria that is the most appropriate for the goal of the simulation. Results are illustrated with a couple of simulations that demonstrate the capabilities of our method as well as the challenges that this different perspective offers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it